Card image cap

Todd Weiler's Ratings and Endorsements

Office:

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

67%
2016
67%
2016
63%
2023
63%
2022
86%
2022
74%
2021
74%
2020
71%
2019
63%
2018
48%
2017
68%
2016
73%
2015
55%
2014
33%
2013
50%
2012
35%
2022
35%
2022
37%
2021
37%
2021
43%
2021
43%
2021
47%
2019
47%
2019
37%
2019
37%
2019
36%
2018
36%
2018
21%
2018
21%
2018
38%
2017
38%
2017
29%
2017
29%
2017
36%
2016
36%
2016
40%
2016
40%
2016
35%
2015
35%
2015
41%
2015
41%
2015
44%
2014
44%
2014
20%
2014
20%
2014
43%
2013
43%
2013
56%
2013
56%
2013
72%
2012
72%
2012
72%
2012
72%
2012
87%
2015
86%
2015
82%
2014
86%
2014
86%
2013
92%
2012
47%
2023
47%
2023
67%
2021
67%
2021
50%
2020
50%
2020
67%
2019
67%
2019
58%
2018
58%
2018
50%
2016
50%
2016
43%
2015
43%
2015
75%
2014
75%
2014
63%
2013
63%
2013
50%
2012
50%
2012
63%
2023
63%
2022
86%
2022
74%
2021
74%
2020
71%
2019
63%
2018
48%
2017
68%
2016
73%
2015
55%
2014
33%
2013
50%
2012
63%
2023
100%
2022
69%
2021
83%
2020
92%
2019
86%
2018
92%
2018
83%
2017
83%
2017
85%
2016
93%
2016
89%
2015-2020
78%
2015
69%
2014
91%
2013
92%
2012
63%
2023
86%
2022
63%
2022
74%
2021
74%
2020
71%
2019
63%
2018
48%
2017
68%
2016
73%
2015
55%
2014
33%
2013
50%
2012
48%
2019
48%
2019
63%
2023
86%
2022
63%
2022
74%
2021
74%
2020
71%
2019
63%
2018
48%
2017
68%
2016
73%
2015
55%
2014
33%
2013
50%
2012
63%
2023
100%
2022
69%
2021
83%
2020
92%
2019
92%
2018
86%
2018
83%
2017
83%
2017
93%
2016
85%
2016
89%
2015-2020
78%
2015
69%
2014
91%
2013
92%
2012
arrow_upward