Card image cap

Margaret Dayton's Ratings and Endorsements

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

0%
2006
0%
2006
68%
2017
52%
2016
90%
2015
90%
2014
71%
2013
67%
2012
58%
2011
86%
2010
53%
1998
81%
2018
81%
2018
71%
2017
71%
2017
81%
2017
81%
2017
81%
2016
81%
2016
73%
2016
73%
2016
81%
2015
81%
2015
82%
2015
82%
2015
82%
2014
82%
2014
80%
2014
80%
2014
74%
2013
74%
2013
82%
2013
82%
2013
82%
2012
82%
2012
94%
2012
94%
2012
90%
2010
90%
2010
82%
2010
82%
2010
86%
2009
86%
2009
70%
2008
70%
2008
76%
2007
76%
2007
70%
2006
70%
2006
95%
2005
95%
2005
84%
2004
84%
2004
81%
2003
81%
2003
86%
2002
86%
2002
95%
1998
95%
1998
71%
1997
71%
1997
93%
2015
80%
2015
100%
2014
98%
2014
100%
2013
92%
2012
20%
2017
40%
2016
33%
2015
38%
2014
11%
2008
9%
2007
30%
2006
29%
2005
25%
2004
6%
2003
0%
2001-2002
0%
2001
0%
2000
75%
1999
53%
1998
29%
2016
29%
2016
0%
2015
25%
2014
25%
2014
38%
2013
38%
2013
38%
2012
38%
2012
29%
2011
29%
2011
29%
2010
29%
2010
38%
2009
38%
2009
14%
2008
14%
2008
43%
2007
43%
2007
38%
2006
38%
2006
43%
2004
43%
2004
43%
2003
43%
2003
40%
2002
40%
2002
20%
1997
20%
1997
44%
1998
10%
2002
25%
2018
68%
2017
52%
2016
90%
2015
90%
2014
71%
2013
67%
2012
58%
2011
86%
2010
94%
2018
83%
2017
94%
2017
94%
2016
88%
2016
100%
2015
94%
2014
91%
2013
92%
2012
92%
2011
100%
2010
100%
2009
94%
2008
100%
2007
100%
2006
90%
2005
95%
2004
100%
2001-2002
68%
2017
52%
2016
90%
2015
90%
2014
71%
2013
67%
2012
58%
2011
86%
2010
68%
2017
52%
2016
90%
2015
90%
2014
71%
2013
67%
2012
58%
2011
86%
2010
94%
2018
83%
2017
94%
2017
88%
2016
94%
2016
100%
2015
94%
2014
91%
2013
92%
2012
92%
2011
100%
2010
100%
2009
94%
2008
100%
2007
100%
2006
90%
2005
95%
2004
100%
2001-2002
arrow_upward