Secret Science Reform Act

Press Release

Date: March 18, 2015
Location: Washington, DC

Today the U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation cosponsored by Congressman Kevin Cramer to require the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to base its regulations on scientific data that is public. The Secret Science Reform Act requires the EPA to make publically available any scientific information it uses to propose, finalize, or disseminate regulations.

"Time and time again, the EPA has refused to provide the scientific data they claim to be using to justify their regulatory decisions. Even after we voted for a subpoena in the House Science Committee, they have continued to insist on secrecy. If the EPA wants to tell North Dakota how to run our energy industry, operate our farms, and take care of our air and water, then we ought to at least be able to look at the data they're using to draw their conclusions," said Cramer.

In 2013, Congressman Cramer voted to issue a subpoena to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for scientific data it uses to justify regulations, yet refuses to release publically. The House Committee on Science, Space and Technology filed the subpoena after continually asking the EPA to provide the data and receiving no response from the agency.

Many of the EPA's most costly regulations including standards for air quality and for coal-fired power plants are based on two government-sponsored studies: the Harvard Six Cities Study and the American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study II. This taxpayer-funded data has never been made available to Congress or to the public for independent analysis. Both the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the National Academy of Sciences have expressed significant concerns with the EPA's continued use of this decades-old data. In a 2013 report to Congress, the OMB states "some of the scientific and economic questions are not resolved… significant uncertainty remains" regarding the numbers.

The legislation passed today has received letters of support from over 80 scientists and experts, 30 trade associations, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the former head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and the former head of EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee.


Source
arrow_upward