"Actively Engaged" in the Farm Bill
Press Release
"Actively Engaged" in the Farm Bill
Senator Chuck Grassley today made the following comment after some senators wrote in a letter to the U.S. Department of Agriculture that the farm bill did not require changes in the way individuals or entities are determined to be "actively-engaged" in farming.
Grassley said the farm bill does, in fact, say that implementation of the AGI and payment limits include issues such as "actively engaged." The section of the farm bill referencing actively engaged is included following Grassley's statement.
Grassley, along with Senator Byron Dorgan, also sent a letter to the Agriculture Department to lay out their intent in the language in the "Statement of Managers" included in the 2008 farm bill. The letter is included in this press release.
Here is Grassley's statement.
"The assertions are contrary to my good faith agreement with the opponents of payment limits. Just as we clearly laid out our intent on the 10-acre provision, the intent was clearly laid out to make sure actively engaged was a part of the discussion. These folks have done everything in their power to keep giving 70 percent of our farm payments to only 10 percent of the farmers. Our farm payment system is a safety net for those who need it most. It was not intended to help big farmers get bigger. We cannot continue to have a farm bill gain the support of rural and urban lawmakers if we don't address this adequately. This farm bill made a decent attempt at reform, but actions that will undermine the little bit that we actually included threatens the good that can come out of the bill."
Here is the section of the farm bill.
In the Joint statement of Managers: Section 33.
(33) Administration Generally
The House bill authorizes the use of the Commodity Credit Corporation in
carrying out the provisions of title I, and, generally, continues other administrative
provisions of the 2002 farm bill. (Section 1501)
The Senate amendment includes the same provisions as the House measure, and includes an additional provision to exempt producers who have an option to receive advance direct and partial counter-cyclical payments from constructive receipt of those payments. (Section 1701)
The Conference substitute adopts the Senate provision with an amendment to provide for interim regulations to implement the payment limitations and adjusted gross income provisions. (Section 1601)
Beginning with the 2009 crop, the Conference substitute includes significant reforms to payment limitation and adjusted gross income provisions. This is a complex and long-standing area of the law and regulations, many of which have been in effect for decades. The continuity and predictability of these regulations is important to the economic stability of farm operators, the lenders that finance them, the input suppliers who provide their seed, feed, fertilizer and other inputs, and indeed for the agricultural economy as a whole. In order to avoid undue disruption of all of these sectors of the agricultural economy, the Managers expect USDA to provide adequate notice and opportunity for comment, consistent with the interim rule process, for Sections 1603 and 1604, to ensure these changes are implemented in a manner that is least disruptive to producers and other stakeholders, and that allows the programs to continue to achieve their objectives.
The Managers further expect that in the rulemaking process, USDA will give priority to addressing matters within the scope of these legislative changes and guidance in this Statement in order to minimize program and regulatory disruption, to maximize continuity and predictability, and to focus the scarce resources of the Department of Agriculture on implementing these and other specific regulatory requirements in this bill.
The Managers also expect that during the interim rule process USDA will amend the regulations as necessary or appropriate to implement these statutory changes consistent with the intent and guidance provided by the Managers throughout this Statement. The Managers expect the notice and comment period regarding the implementation of the AGI and payment limitation provisions to include issues such as, family definitions, denial of program benefits, notification of interests in operation, changes in farming operations, actively engaged, schemes and devices, apportionment of income for joint filers, and spousal eligibility.
The Managers expect the Secretary to implement the AGI provision in a manner that provides equitable treatment, to the maximum extent practicable, to all producers
For Immediate Release
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Grassley Urges Immediate Rulemaking for Actively Engaged Farmers
WASHINGTON - Senator Chuck Grassley today asked U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer to immediately look at the rules for "actively engaged farmers" and "devices and schemes." Grassley, along with Senator Byron Dorgan, have sent a letter to Schafer that lays out their intent in the language in the "Statement of Managers" included in the 2008 farm bill.
"Very few of us were satisfied with the farm payment reform that was finally agreed to in the farm bill, so this is an opportunity for the administration, that you'd think they'd be crying for, to leave its mark in this area," Grassley said. "The farm bill left some big loopholes that we can start to close with the right action by the administration."
Grassley has led efforts in Congress to put a hard cap on farm payments and ensure that payments go people in the business of farming. During the Senate farm bill debate, Grassley and Dorgan introduced a payment limits amendment that would have put a hard cap of $250,000 on federal farm program payments and ensure that only farmers get payments. The amendment received a majority of 56 votes, but did not pass because it was required to reach a 60 vote threshold.
Here's a copy of the text of the letter to Schafer.
July 8, 2008
The Honorable Ed Schafer
Secretary
US Department of Agriculture
1400 Independence Ave, SW
Washington , DC 20250
Dear Secretary Schafer,
As you begin the rulemaking process for the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, we wanted to bring to your attention specific language in the bill.
Section 1603 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 addresses changes in commodity program payment limits. In addition to the statutory changes, the Statement of the Managers directs USDA to produce rule changes, subject to public notice and comment, pertaining to actively engaged in farming rules and schemes and devices (Report 110-627, page 695). As the authors of bills and amendments to sharpen rules related to "actively engaged" and "schemes and devices," we are requesting that USDA take immediate action to produce interim rules on these two issues that restore integrity to our payment limit system.
The time to make changes to payment limitations is now, during implementation of the new farm bill. The farm bill conference report calls on you to draft new regulations and implement new payment limitation changes for the 2009 crop or program year. As you rightfully indicated during the farm bill debate, "It is vitally important, however, that rules and regulations are drafted in such a way that they maintain the integrity of congressional intent and provide fair and equitable distribution of benefits."
We urge you to specifically ensure that the USDA rulemaking process implements recommendations from the 2003 Report of the USDA Commission on the Application of Payment Limitations for Agriculture and the 2004 Government Accountability Office report entitled Farm Program Payments: USDA Should Correct Weaknesses in Regulations and Oversight to Better Ensure Recipients Do Not Circumvent Payment Limitations. These reports recommend stricter enforcements and oversight to ensure that individuals who receive farm payments are actually "actively engaged in farming" and that the primary control requirement is met through proper oversight of schemes and devices that have historically been used to evade payment limitations.
Regarding actively engaged rules, we support the USDA Commission on the Application of Payment Limitations for Agriculture's recommendation that the active personal labor and management requirements be combined into a single criterion for active labor and management. We also support the Commission's recommendation that USDA "define active personal labor and management through rulemaking to ensure individuals' contribution to the operation is meaningful and measurable."
The GAO also identified the lack of a measurable standard for active management as a key cause of payment limitation abuse. According to the GAO, by not specifying such a measurable standard, USDA allows individuals who may have limited involvement with the farming operation to qualify for payments.
In addition, the GAO highlighted schemes and devices used to channel payments through "paper" farms and affiliated family-held non-farming entities back through to the same person or entity exercising primary control. The GAO found large farming operations that were structured as one or more partnerships, each consisting of multiple corporations that increased farm program payments in a questionable manner.
The amendment we offered during Senate consideration of the farm bill addressed both of these issues head on. While our amendment received majority support in the senate, it was not accepted. Portions relating to actively engaged and schemes and devices can be helpful to use as a starting point as you begin the rulemaking process.
The amendment specified that:
· the total contribution of personal labor and active management should be at least equal to the lesser of 1,000 hours or a fifty percent commensurate share of the total number of hours required to conduct farming operations;
· stockholders or members of an entity that collectively own at least 51 percent of the combined beneficial interest in the entity shall each make a significant contribution of labor and management to the operation;
· no stockholder or member may provide labor or management to meet the requirements for individuals or entities that collectively receive, directly or indirectly, an amount greater than the payment limit;
· crop share landowners claiming the special exemption to the actively engaged rules must rent land at usual and customary rates, with the share of the landowner commensurate with the share of the crop or income received as rent; and
· USDA write rules regarding "primary control" to crack down on the types of schemes and devices uncovered by the GAO.
For your convenience, we are attaching the relevant language from the amendment to this letter and urge you to use it to the maximum extent possible in the drafting of the interim rule on these two critical subjects.
We request that you provide a briefing for us as soon as possible this summer to report about progress USDA has made with the interim rulemaking for payment limits and AGI in general, and on "actively engaged" and "schemes and devices," in particular.
Thank you for your serious consideration of our request and your leadership on this important issue. We firmly believe that while the Administration did not get all of the reform it wanted in the new farm bill, the opportunity created by the Managers language on actively engaged and schemes and devices provides a second chance for a lasting legacy to ensure our farm program payments are justifiable and equitable for the next five years and beyond.
Sincerely,
Charles
E. Grassley Byron L. Dorgan
United States Senator United States Senator
Enclosure (1)
cc:
White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten
Assistant to the President Barry Jackson
OMB Director Jim Nussle
Deputy Secretary Chuck Conner
Under Secretary Mark Keenum
Deputy Under Secretary Floyd Gaibler
Administrator Teresa Lasseter
Source