BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
HAYES: Joining me now for more on this story, Democratic Congressman Adam
Schiff of California. He, of course, is the chair of the House Intelligence
Committee. I want to start first, Congressman, with -- obviously you can`t
get into anything classified, but just your -- how much this jives with
what you know, or your assessment of the -- of the sort of contours of the
overall story of these as they`ve been told in the press?
REP. ADAM SCHIFF (D-CA): Well, you`re right. I can`t get into any
classified information. But you know, look, the Russians and Putin in
particular view the world in zero sum terms. Anything that helps the United
States is bad for Russia and vice versa. They have nothing but malevolent
intent towards the United States. I think that also concerns our troops
wherever their station.
And so, we need to get to the bottom of these reports. I`m going to be
briefed at the White House tomorrow. I`m asking that my entire committee be
briefed by the Intel agencies and indeed the Speaker wants the whole house
briefed as is perfectly appropriate. But is this another situation where
the President either was told and just rejects it or his people are too
scared to tell him because it contradicts this narrative of Vladimir Putin
being his buddy.
You know, I watched the interview with Peskov, the Kremlin spokesman, where
he not only denied it, but he used profanity to deny it. And you know how
that impresses Donald Trump when someone denies something strongly. After
all, in Helsinki, when he was choosing between what his intelligence
agencies were telling him and what Vladimir Putin was telling him, he made
a, you know, particular point about talking about how strong Putin`s
denials were as if that`s somehow a good index of the truth.
So we need to know, was the President informed about this, were options
presented to the President about this, or are they simply afraid to present
the President with anything he doesn`t want to hear?
HAYES: There was a strange briefing that happened today, of course, that
you weren`t included in. The White House briefed eight House Republicans on
the Intel. The Democrats are scheduled tomorrow. I don`t -- maybe I`m
missing something. Maybe this is fairly standard operating procedure for
this kind of thing, but I can`t recall something like that. What is going
on there?
SCHIFF: It`s not standard operating procedure, at least it certainly
shouldn`t be. Those briefings should be done in a bipartisan basis. Now, I
did have some communication from the White House today and I expect
tomorrow we will get a briefing of some of the Democratic National Security
chairs. But it really ought to be done in a non-partisan way with both
parties represented.
It`s important, frankly, that we hear the same information. That`s why, you
know, these briefings, you know, we try to do these all in a bipartisan
basis in our committee. At the moment the Republicans are boycotting the
briefings that we are doing. But it`s really, you know, beneficial,
frankly, to make sure that neither party is getting a different take from
either intelligence leaders or the White House.
HAYES: Wait, the Republicans are boycotting the briefings in our committee
right now?
SCHIFF: They have been, yes. And we`re not quite sure why. They don`t have
much of an explanation for it. But we`ve had important briefings on
national security issues. We have another one coming up this week. And for
whatever reason, they`ve decided on mass, they`re not going to attend and
so they`re ignoring the work of the committee.
HAYES: Wait a second. A boycott doesn`t work unless you articulate the
reason for your boycott, so that the people you`re boycotting could concede
to your demands. What you`re saying is they`re boycotting your committee
briefings but not telling you why?
SCHIFF: Yes. We`ve got no explanation. I saw one of the members try to
explain that they don`t think that it`s secure enough. But these briefings
are unclassified material. In fact, some of these briefings are open
hearings, and they`re still not even attending, even the open hearings for
the public.
So, I`m not sure how to explain it. I think it`s very childish. But the
more fundamental point, whether it`s the work of our committee, or it`s a
briefing from the White House, is really ought to be done on a nonpartisan
basis so that all the members are operating from good information.
HAYES: What -- I mean, what is the next step here? If this -- I mean, if --
there`s two pressing matters here, right? Like did the President know about
this, this administration about this and do nothing, and in fact, as
Senator Murphy said, essentially get a green light to bounties on the heads
of American servicemen and women, and also what to be done now. If in fact
that that that has happened and what the -- what the implications of that
are. What is your -- what is your feeling about that?
SCHIFF: Well, you know, I think what we need to do is we need to get an
explanation a briefing from the Intelligence Community leadership, what are
they know these allegations, what kind of confidence do they have, and what
they may or may not know about these allegations? And have there been
policy debates within the administration about what they`re planning to do
if they`re going to sit on their hands because this president can`t stand
up to Vladimir Putin.
Congress needs to take steps to protect our troops and to protect our
national interest. You know, we have seen time and time again, this
President put his own personal interests above those of the nation. This
may be another example of the president doing that, or maybe another
example of Intelligence Community or other leadership simply afraid to
confront the president.
They -- you know, we`ve already seen how there`s a reluctance to brief the
President on Russian interference in our election. He doesn`t want to hear
it. He thinks it`s all a hoax. Is this an extension of that denial of
reality by the president?
HAYES: Congressman Adam Schiff, the chair of the House Intelligence
Committee. Thank you so much for your time.
SCHIFF: Thanks, Chris.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT