BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
I`m joined now by Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat of Connecticut who`s a
member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. And I want to start on
the second story there, which has been building over the weekend. Your
understanding of what happened with Russia and what the President did or
did not do and what the meaning of it all is.
SEN. CHRIS MURPHY (D-CT): So I think we have to rewind a bit here. At the
beginning of the Trump presidency, open-source reporting told us that
Russia was starting to get more aggressive in Afghanistan. They were
allegedly reportedly starting to funnel weapons directly in through
intermediaries to the Taliban. They were getting more involved in the
political process, something they weren`t doing to that extent under the
Obama administration.
The reports from this weekend, though, suggests Russia has been playing an
entirely different game, that they are actually paying bounties for the
heads of American soldiers, that they are paying out cash to Taliban
operatives if they kill American soldiers. If that is true, it is a level
of engagement in the Afghanistan theater that we have not seen previously,
and it demands a response.
And what the New York Times says is that as you mentioned, the Trump team
talked about this. They reviewed options including asking Russia to stop.
And even that was deemed too hot for Trump`s taste. We didn`t even ask them
to stop. And that does beg the question, what on earth could Russia do to
us that this administration would actually take seriously?
HAYES: That question of the response, you know, struck me as not an easy
one, right? So, in this case, if you have that intelligence, and if it is
actually verified, right, this is one of those tough governing challenges,
right? We`re not going to go to war with Russia. We`re not going to, you
know, try to arm other militias that might be fighting the Russians. Maybe
you can mobilize international efforts, put sanctions on them although
they`re being sanctioned all over the place.
So it`s not easy. They`re not some button to press. But it`s precisely
those kinds of hard problems that are what presidents are for, and just
seem -- just completely be on the capacity three and a half years into this
of this particular administration.
MURPHY: Well, and once again, as you reviewed, we sent the exact opposite
signal, right. We could have tried a number of different means to affect
their decision making in Afghanistan and save the lives of brave young
American soldiers. But instead, we invited them back into the G7. We
engaged with him on multiple occasions without even mentioning the fact
that we apparently knew they were putting bounties on the heads of American
soldiers.
And so we effectively greenlit their assassination campaign against
American soldiers, which is, of course, in many ways worse than doing
absolutely nothing at all about it.
HAYES: Right. You are from a state that is -- was very, very hard hit by
Coronavirus in the initial -- the initial phase in March in April, among
those trio states, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut that was a sort of
Epicenter, probably the worst outbreak in the world, those three states
together.
What is the conversation on Capitol Hill right now among you and your
colleagues and everyone in the U.S. government as we watch this start to go
sideways, as we watch states starts to walk back, as we see case records
being set in Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, and these shrinking group
of states that maybe things are still trending in the right direction but
who knows if that`ll hold?
MURPHY: Yes. We have less than 100 people in the hospital today which is a
record low. We have positive test rates of under one percent. And we were a
hotspot just two months ago. What we did was pretty simple. We closed up
our economy and kept it closed until our rates got low enough. And we
developed a mask wearing culture that was apolitical. Republicans and
Democrats wear masks in Connecticut.
And so, what`s so dangerous is that knowing what needs to be done in order
to control the affection in places like Florida and Texas, they are
unwilling to copy our success. We were the guinea pigs. We showed the rest
of the country how you actually do this right. And it`s unforgiveable in
many respects, that these other states are not going to follow our example.
We wanted help to fund our response as we were trying to figure out what
worked and what did not. Now those states are going to be asking for help
from the federal government while at the same time they refused to
implement the steps that we know could get the virus under control.
HAYES: Final question for you. Is there -- I feel like in some ways we`re
back -- we set the clock back to late February, early March where you could
kind of see what`s coming and I just feel like there`s a gap between what`s
bearing down on us in the urgency. Do you, Senator, and your colleagues,
Democrat and Republican alike, understand that extraordinary action will
have to be taken if we see cases raised up again.
And I`m not even talking about governor shutting down their states. I`m
talking about the members United States Senate passing more rescue relief,
extending unemployment benefits, extending programs to help small
businesses because if those states shut down again, everyone is in a lot of
trouble.
MURPHY: The answer your question is no. Right now, Republicans are actively
frustrating efforts in the Senate to pass any kind of relief efforts to the
state. Actually, just an hour ago, we asked to bring up legislation before
the Senate to get an additional amount of relief to states to help them
build out new anti-pandemic infrastructure and that effort was objected to
by Mitch McConnell and his lieutenants.
And so, it looks as if we`re going to go on break for two weeks over the
Fourth of July, having invested absolutely zero new dollars into these
states that are seeing the virus expand. Those states, at the same time,
are refusing to take the public health steps that would actually contract
the virus.
And we`re heading towards catastrophe, states unwilling to do what evidence
tells them is necessary to contract the spread of the virus and a
Republican Congress unwilling -- in the Senate, at least -- to pass
legislation that will help those states. God save us all.
HAYES: Senator Chris Murphy, thank you so much for making a little time for
us tonight.
MURPHY: Thanks.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT