BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
MATTHEWS: Well, if confirmed, Kavanaugh would solidify a hard-right majority on the Supreme Court and would rule on pivotal issues, like, of course, abortion rights, gun rights, and whether or not a president can be investigated -- or, indicted, rather.
And another unexpected moment, this image of Fred Guttenberg, whose daughter Jaime was murdered during the Parkland shooting, reaching out to shake the judge`s hand as he turned away.
Well, that doesn`t look good. There it is. Watch this. He looks at the guy, and then he just walks away from him.
Well, the White House issue this response to that image -- quote -- "As Judge Kavanaugh left for his lunch break, an unidentified individual approached him. Before the judge was able to shake his hand, security had intervened."
For more, I`m joined by Senator Chris Coons, Democrat from Delaware. He`s on the Judiciary.
What did you make of that incident? Is it important or not that the nominee for the Supreme Court wouldn`t give time to a guy who happened to be the father of one of the victims of Parkland High?
COONS: Well, he came over and spoke with me and a number of other senators just a few minutes later, Chris. He was very disappointed and upset that Judge Kavanaugh wouldn`t shake his hand, wouldn`t speak to him for even a moment.
He just wanted to convey the heartbreak, the loss of a father whose daughter had been murdered in the Parkland shootings, and wanted to emphasize to Judge Kavanaugh the ways in which Americans all over the country are watching this hearing, this confirmation process, eager to know what his views are on important issues, including gun control, the Second Amendment, and whether or not he should give up all hope of responsible gun legislation should Judge Kavanaugh become Justice Kavanaugh.
MATTHEWS: Is -- do you think Kavanaugh is one of those people that would have believed -- gone along with the Heller decision, who believed completely in the right to bear arms at any point, it has nothing to do with having a militia back in the colonial times or the federal period times, it`s just some absolute right?
Do you think he`s one of those?
COONS: Yes, I do.
MATTHEWS: What do you think of that in terms of a nominee?
COONS: Well
MATTHEWS: Should somebody be on the court who believes in the absolute right to a gun?
COONS: I mean, my concern, Chris, across a lot of different topics that Judge Kavanaugh has written about, spoken about where he`s issued decisions on the D.C. Circuit is that he is significantly outside the mainstream of American judicial thinking.
He`s got views on a whole bunch of issues. As you mentioned a few moments ago, the one that concerns me most is his views on presidential power. We may never see President Trump interviewed by special counsel Mueller if Judge Kavanaugh`s views end up dominating a future Supreme Court, because he has both written and spoken to the point that he doesn`t think a president should be subject to a subpoena for evidence or for testimony.
MATTHEWS: Do you think he`s another Robert Bork?
COONS: Yes.
MATTHEWS: Explain.
COONS: If by that, you mean a very intelligent, very well grounded in his view of the law, but holding a view of the law that is significantly outside the mainstream of current American thinking.
I think a new majority on the court, with Judge Kavanaugh added to it, would be significantly more conservative than the majority of the American people.
MATTHEWS: What I`m getting at is, Bork was the one who went along with the Saturday Night Massacre.
COONS: Right.
MATTHEWS: He thought the president had a right to fire anybody he wanted to fire right down the line, to get what he wanted to protect him from prosecution.
COONS: And we see in Judge Kavanaugh`s decisions and speeches as recently as this year a view of the president`s power. It`s called the unitary executive theory, to give it a fancy name, but it`s rooted in a dissent by Scalia that`s now, I think, more than 20 years old.
And just this year, Judge Kavanaugh, differing with the Supreme Court majority, differing with the majority in his own circuit court, keeps citing this Scalia dissent as the way the law should go.
In a recent speech, he said, of all the decisions, all the decisions that he thinks deserve to be overturned, it`s that decision where a majority of the Supreme Court said it was constitutional for there to be an independent counsel investigating the president.
MATTHEWS: Last point.
That`s to say that President Trump, as president, is the country`s chief law enforcement official.
COONS: That`s right.
(LAUGHTER)
MATTHEWS: You say it so quietly.
COONS: That`s right.
MATTHEWS: But to most Americans hearing that today think, you mean he`s in charge of his own prosecution and justice in terms of himself?
COONS: That`s right.
MATTHEWS: That he is, the president.
COONS: That makes no sense. That makes absolutely no sense, in my view.
I think that`s exactly why this is so concerning to me, just days after President Trump has once again launched a Twitter attack on the attorney general, on the special counsel, and now, alarmingly, is demanding that his own political allies not be prosecuted by the independent professional career prosecutors of the Department of Justice.
We have got a president, I am afraid, who is looking for a justice who will give him a pass.
MATTHEWS: Sounds like the Il Duce theory.
Thank you so much, Chris Coons. Thank you, Congressman -- United States senator from the state of Delaware.
COONS: Thank you, Chris.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT