Rating Group: Council for a Livable World

2013-2014 Positions

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.


results per page:
State Office Name Party Rating
Leonard Lance 50%
Dan Lipinski 50%
Dan Maffei 50%
MA U.S. House - 1 Richard Neal Democratic 50%
Bill Owens 50%
Cedric Richmond 50%
Jim Sensenbrenner, Jr. 50%
Carol Shea-Porter 50%
MA U.S. Senate - Jr Ed Markey Democratic 43%
Ron Barber 40%
Dan Benishek 40%
Michael Burgess 40%
Pete Gallego 40%
Jaime Herrera Beutler 40%
Sean Maloney 40%
Jim Matheson 40%
CA U.S. House - 5 Tom McClintock Republican 40%
Mike McIntyre 40%
Tom Price 40%
Rob Woodall 40%
Rodney Davis 30%
Tom Graves, Jr. 30%
Richard Hanna 30%
NV U.S. House - 4 Steven Horsford Democratic 30%
MI U.S. House - 4 Bill Huizenga Republican 30%
arrow_upward