Card image cap

Neal Kurk's Ratings and Endorsements

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

60%
2015-2016
23%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
50
2011-2012
0
2011-2012
18
2011-2012
100
2011-2012
49
2011-2012
58%
2008
67%
2007
27%
2006
30%
2004
23%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
60%
2015-2016
0
2011-2012
18
2011-2012
100
2011-2012
49
2011-2012
50
2011-2012
58%
2008
67%
2007
27%
2006
30%
2004
58.82%
2017-2018
58.82%
2017-2018
23%
2015-2016
23%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
60%
2015-2016
60%
2015-2016
50
2011-2012
0
2011-2012
0
2011-2012
18
2011-2012
18
2011-2012
100
2011-2012
100
2011-2012
50
2011-2012
49
2011-2012
49
2011-2012
58%
2008
58%
2008
67%
2007
67%
2007
27%
2006
27%
2006
30%
2004
30%
2004
69%
2017
66%
2016
66%
2016
66%
2015
66%
2015
73%
2014
73%
2014
78%
2013
78%
2013
63
2011-2012
73
2011-2012
73
2011-2012
63
2011-2012
71%
2010
71%
2010
80%
2009
80%
2009
83
2007-2008
83
2007-2008
85
2007
85
2007
65 %
2006
65 %
2006
63%
2005-2006
63%
2005-2006
58 %
2005
58 %
2005
76%
2000
76%
2000
71%
1999
71%
1999
arrow_upward